  |
 A list of hoaxes perpetrated by the
devotees of Charles Darwin to prop up their theory of
evolution, especially human evolution
To be absolutely honest, these
scams do not prove evolution to be false. What
they do clearly indicate however, is the mindset
of many scientists, who are so desperate for evolution
to be true that they will cling to anything,
even fabricated evidence, if it seems to support
this doctrine. However, in reality
it is not science, but their atheism, that is driving
this dogma, for whereas
the Christian is free to make
up his mind on the evidence, the
atheist absolutely needs evolution
to be true.
A
list of intelligently designed scams carried out by Darwin's
disciples to support their religion's creation myth
Archaeoraptor: Piltdown
bird - COMING SOON
Ernst
Haeckel's embryo drawings: To aquire a feel
for that "mountain of evidense" supporting the theory
of evolution that Darwinists keep telling us about, just reflect
on the fact that these drawing, until the were exposed as another
scam, constituted for 100 years the main argument for this secular
creation myth.
Peppered moths: If
scientists are so intelligent, why did it take Darwinians fifty years
to spot the discarded tin of Super Glue?
Piltdown man: If
scientists are so intelliegent, why did it take Darwinians another fifty
years to spot the baseball cap on Piltdown man?
Other Essays
Intelligible
Design and Darwin's Black Box It might have been
plausible, in the naïve days of the 19th century, to speak
of the ascent of higher forms of life from lower forms, of a movement
from the simple to the complex. But that is no longer possible
for the simple reason that we cannot find a “simple” form
of life ...
|
-- HOW THE GREAT CON WORKS ---
The devotees of the Darwinian secular
creation myth rely heavily on one simple trick: a
series of drawing allegedly illustrating a progression
from ape to modern man. This is a clever con simply
because it is so plausible. We all know that species
adapt to fit their environment. Men who live in
mountainous regions have a larger lung capacity to cope
with the reduced oxigen in the amosphere for example. But
that is not what Darwinism requires us to believe. Darwinism
requies us to believe that we evolved from earth
worms, slugs or earwigs, or indeed even lower life
forms.
Richard Dawkins regards Catholics
as credulous because they believe that the Great
God who threw the stars into their orbits and knit
you and me together in our mothers' wombs can turn
bread and wine into the body, blood, soul and divinity
of His Son. But
Dawkins believes that the Great Nothingness that
he worships can turn slugs into human beings! And
he believes Catholic are
gullible!
The second trick used by secularists
is to propose two alternatives; a literal interpretation
of Genesis, i.e. the cosmos was created in six literal
24-hour days with God taking a breather on the seventh
day, or their survival of the fittest evolutionary
creed. But
it is perfectly reasonable to reject evolution as
a secular creation myth without embracing a literal
interpretation of Genesis. In dealing wit a
mystery as propound as being, there is no disgrace
in being a "don't know". As Ann Coulter
rather cleverly expressed it, one can be a restaurant
critic without owning one's own restaurant.
|
  |
|
|
