Le Tocsin

“The true friends of the people are neither revolutionaries nor innovators, but men of Tradition”– Pope St Pius X

The Fruitful Shall Inherit the Earth

Some very exciting and encouraging forecasts have come out of a recent study of priestly ordinations in France.  The study looked not only at the number of traditional priests as against Novus Ordo priests being ordained, but at the current total numbers of each group and their average ages.

The really significant fact is that the average age of a Novus Ordo priest in France is 75!  Put simply this means that the Novus Ordo church in France is standing on the edge of a very steep precipice.  The study concludes that by 2038, a mere twenty-five years from now, the majority of priests in France will be traditionalists.

However, I believe we can be even more hopeful than this report suggests, because the report has only graphed the growth of the traditional orders, groups such as the SSPX, the FSSP, the Institute of the Good Shepherd etc.  But there is another story, what about the young men coming out of Novus Order seminaries who are traditional minded, and what about those Novus Order priests who are returning to tradition - the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate being just one example?

Add in the further fact that traditional Catholics, unlike their Novus Ordo brothers and sisters, and secularists in general, are not busy contracepting themselves out of existence, and I believe the future could be very bright indeed for the Church in France.  I suspect that I am too old to see the new dawn, but my children could well live to see France as a vibrate Catholic country once again and ready to reclaim its role as the eldest daughter of the Church.  And where France goes, who knows, other countries may not be too far behind.  It won't happen overnight, but I suspect we could be talking about decades rather than centuries.

Surly we are witnessing another thread being woven into that beautiful prophesy of our Lady at Fatima, "My Immaculate Heart will eventually triumph."  Maybe we can begin to dare hope that the day will come when popes who have sold their souls to the Zeitgeist, like Pope Humble the First, and scandalous prelates like Vincent Nichols, Cardinal Dolan et al will be just historical footnotes, mere painful memories of an older generation.

There could of course be other clouds on the horizon: Islam and militant secularism two obvious examples, but the Novus Ordo sect, in France at least, is now very clearly and securely lodged on death row.  I prophesised fifty years ago that this day would come, but was denounced for not being "open to the Spirit".   I inquired at the time whether they were talking about the Spirit that had been around for the last 2000 years or the one that had just turned up - no response forthcoming at the time, as far as I recall.

Conversation in a London Cab

A very good friend of mine is a cab driver.  He recently picked up a fare, an elderly smartly dressed man.  In the course of conversation, it soon became apparent that the man was something of a big-wig in the Conservative party head-quarters.  The following conversation ensued:

Cabby: "I can't get my head round Cameron.  What this obsession with gay "marriage" all about?

"You don't understand it!" exclaimed the fare, "Neither do I ... and I'm gay."

AM I MISSING SOMETHING AGAIN "Do you ever have the feeling that we are all puppets whose strings are being pulled by some sinister, anonymous, unseen puppeteer?"

Can anyone give me a logical reason why the West, edged on by America, is currently teaming up to demonize Putin and Russia?

The West first helped overthrow the democratically elected government of the Ukraine for no better reason than said government was pro-Russian and not over enthusiastic about the EEC - an unsurprising fact given that the majority of Ukrainians were pro-Russian (is it only silly old me who had this dopey idea that democracy was supposed to be all about electing governments that reflected the will of the majority).  In the meantime, the media in general and the odious BBC in particular, had been busy duping us into believing that a series of violent localised riots that took place in the capital Kiev was some sort of spontaneous national popular uprising.

Having deliberately destabilised the country, we then blamed Russia for the fact that it inevitably, and entirely predictably, broke up into warring factions.  Putin and Russia, then became pariahs who needed to be punished for supporting the pro-Russian majority!  This, despite the fact that Britain actively supports pro-British majorities and pro-British separatists in Gibraltar, the Channel Island, the Falklands and, nearer home, Ulster - even maintaining large armies in most of these places to defend the pro-British majorities - pro-British majorities that in many cases had been artificially created.

Then of course came the tragic shooting out of the sky of the civilian airliner, with the massive loss of innocent life.  Again the West and its poodles in the media portray Russia as the sinister hand responsible, notwithstanding the fact that Putin obviously needed this tragedy like a hole in the head, as it provided a massive propaganda coop to the West.

Apparently more sabre rattling by the West is needed because it is alleged that it was shot down by Russian separatists with weapons that are alleged to have been supplied by Russia, notwithstanding that fact that there is as yet no hard evidence for any of this.  Which is like a rogue policeman in Northern Island running amok and killing a dozen innocent people with his service revolver, and the EEC and America blaming David Cameron and the British government for having financed the supply of the revolver.

If the moral cretin or moral cretins responsible for shooting down the plane can be positively identified, and the possibility that it was not a tragic accident can be positively excluded, then I for one would be happy to see those responsible dangling on the end of a hangman's noose. 

In the meantime, am I alone in being reluctant to lunch World War III, on the basis of mere allegations of Western leaders and their lapdogs in the media?

Do you ever have the feeling that we are all puppets whose strings are being pulled by some sinister, anonymous, unseen puppeteer?

The Devil is Not Having it All His Own Way

With acknowledgement to Anthony Ozimic, Patrick Buckley and the the CatholicVoice (abridged and adapted by Don McGovern)

The UN's Human Rights Council recently passed a resolution for the "Protection of the Family".  This passed in spite of opposition from the UK, the United States and the Republic of Ireland.  These countries opposed it presumably because the resolution significantly failed to mention the new found rights of those addicted to using their lower bowels as sex organs. 

The resolution, in spite of diabolical opposition from anti-life and anti-family forces, passed 26 votes to 14 with 6 abstentions.  Supporters of the resolution included the Russian Federation, India and Indonesia.  The Council threw out an amendment promoting the mealy mouthed concept of "various forms of the family" and stuck with the natural family based on the marriage of one woman and one man.

The resolution further stated that "the family has the primary responsibility for the nurturing and protection of children" - that could have come straight out of a papal encyclical.  And it further stated that the family is "the natural environment for the growth and wellbeing of all its members and particularly children."

The Friends of the Family group currently includes Bangladesh, China, Egypt, El Salvador, Mauritania, Morocco, Namibia, Qatar, the Russian Federation, Sierra Leone, Tunisia and Uganda.  It is also understood that more countries plan to join the group. China's inclusion is however problematic given its one-child policy and the appalling violation of human rights that entails.

Austin Ruse, president of C-FAM wrote:

"The sexual left, also known as the sexual imperialists because of their desire to impose their whacked-out ideas on the rest of the world,  are well and truly frustrated at the UN.  They have huffed and puffed for more than 20 years and they are no further along than they were at the Cairo Conference in 1994.  Over these past months they have tried mightily to advance their agenda in what will be known as the Sustainable Development Goals and with the conclusion of negotiations last Saturday, after a marathon session lasting almost 24 hours, they lost on the family, they lost on “comprehensive sexuality education” and they got no further on reproductive health and rights, not even a syllable further than what they got way back then.  The C-Fam team was there to the bloody end. Congratulations to Wendy Wright, Stefano Gennarini, Rebecca Oas and their fearless leader Lisa Correnti. 

We also report on a big win in Europe. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that same-sex marriage is not a requirement of human rights in Europe.  Did you know that only ten countries of the 47 member Council of Europe allows for same-sex “marriage”?  Didn’t these folks say they were winning the world?  Well, they aren’t.  WE are.

Be brave."

Secularists "constantly talk as if you are an idiot for being just a tad uncertain that your great-grandfather was a frog!"

If a Christian archaeologist was to return from the middle East brandishing a fossilised apple with a bite out of the side and claiming that he had found the garden of Eden and proved that the Genesis account true, he would be dismissed as a crank - and rightly so.

Yet an atheist archaeologist can appear from the jungles of Borneo brandishing one fossilised tooth and the scientific community can proceed to build an entire human sub-species out of the find, complete with progenitors and progeny - and no one raises an eyebrow.

At best this is witness to a rich imagination overlaying an increasing desperation on the part of the scientific community to keep the theory of evolution on the shelf well past its sell-by date.  At worst it is just simply fraud.  Evolution is an area of  "science" the path of which has been littered with frauds from the start.

If you really wanted hard evidence for evolution, the smoking gun was, according to the devotees of the secular liberal faith, the peppered moth.  When industrial pollution in the middle of the nineteenth century started to turn the trunks of trees black, the peppered moth of Darwinic folk legend, once pale, started to turn black, the better to avoid predators, or so it was hypothesized by Darwinic arch-druids.  As evidence for evolution goes it wasn’t quite earth worms turning into elephants, but at least it was something.  It had “evolved” (or at least changed a smidgen) exactly as Darwin had predicted.

It wasn’t quite the stuff to set the heart racing; they were still peppered moths.  The secular miracle of natural selection had nevertheless produced a minor variation within the species.    A destitute man can get excited over a few coppers and up to that point the Darwiniacs had been pretty skint for hard evidence.  Here at last they had a grey moth that had morphed in front of their very eyes into a radically new life form - a slightly darker grey moth.  The secular liberals ecstatically announced that “real science” had proved evolution true yet again and went back to their favourite pastime of calling infidels religious nutters.

One of my grandchildren also goes noticeably darker every summer and one of my friends regularly goes from fat to skinny and back again.  Not exactly the sort of metamorphosis that could turn a midge into a moose, nevertheless, perhaps I could make a bob or two selling the story of my grandson’s amazing ability to change his colour with the seasons to the New Scientist.

In the fifties an Oxford biologist, E.B. Ford, had spent two happy years transporting dark grey moths from the inner city to the countryside and light grey moths from the countryside to the inner city.  After which Ford triumphantly announced that his research had proved that birds could easily spot the dark grey moth on light trees and light grey moths on dark trees.  Voilà - evolution had been proved yet again!

Over the next fifty years the peppered moth’s legend became sacred to Darwinics - a sort of Fatima for atheists.  It became the snow covered peak of that “mountain of evidence” that science journals keep telling us about.  Every school child in the west, before learning how to put a condom on a cucumber, was staring at pictures of a light peppered moth clearly visible on a black tree trunk next to a dark moth that was somewhat less visible.

It was all so reasonable … and yet all so phony.  Some decades later some researchers (who one must presume had been living on another planet and were thus unaware that questioning evolution was a capital offense on planet earth) raised a few trivial issues.  Ted Sargent, an American lepidopterist (the branch of zoology dealing with butterflies and moths) then risked finding himself on the end of a scientific fatwa for bravely pointing out that peppered moths don’t actually alight on tree trunks!  Further, they are nocturnal and fly around at night when birds, apart from owls, are having their forty winks.

It transpired that Ford had rigged his experiments by physically placing moths on tree trunks, somewhere the little critter would never have alighted had they been left to their own devices.  If that wasn’t bad enough, it also become apparent that the famous photos of peppered moths, which regularly show up in Darwinic propaganda even to this day, had been staged: dead moths had been literally stuck to tree trunks!  The “proof” for evolution had suddenly morphed into a sort of Monty Python dead-parrot sketch.  This experiment had been the equivalent of tying the legs of a mouse together and throwing it to a hungry cat, and then exclaiming, “See - this confirms mice evolved legs to escape predators - evolution is proved yet again!”

In her book, Godless: The Church of Liberalism, (A fantastic read by the way) Ann Coulter amusingly quipped to the effect that this exposé brought to an abrupt end the secular liberals one and only recorded love-affair with air pollution.

And how did the Darwinacs respond to this exposure? - you know the ones who keep telling us they are devoted to the scientific method.  Well, to be fair, a couple had the integrity to publicly admit that the game was up, but the rest set about the science of demonising Sargent and ruining his career - Sargent was the zoologist who had played a central part in exposing the fraud.

Others devotees just ploughed on regardless, hoping no one had noticed that their “statue of the Weeping Virgin” wasn’t kosher.  The New Scientist as recently as 9th July 2005 confidently stated, “Evolutionary biologists have long known that the process can happen rapidly - Charles Darwin himself pointed out the observable changes wrought by pigeon fanciers and dog breeders.  A century later biologists showed that peppered moths in England’s industrial heartland had evolved darker colours to camouflage themselves against soot-blackened trees.”  It came as a surprise to many that selective breeding by humans had belonged in the “blind chance mutations of nature” column all along.

In 2005 - three years after it had finally acknowledged that the peppered moths were a fraud - the New York Times carried an article by a biologist, Professor H. Allen Orr, treating the peppered moth scam as an open question “Did the peppered moths evolve dark colour as a defence against birds or for other reasons?  And what role, if any, did the empty cans of superglue and black spray paint found at the scene play in the moth’s evolution.”  Okay - I made up the last sentence.

Orr concluded by called the darkening of the moths a “minor squabble” among biologists that had been inflated by sceptics of evolution.  It was as if the Church was to describe the Galileo affair as a storm in a teacup triggered by a “fanatical pro-elliptical orbist”!   Peppered moths fly at night (when birds are having a kip) and don’t alight on tree trunks - aren’t these what old-school scientists used to call facts?

Is there anything funnier than secular liberals? - they engineer comical frauds in defence of their religious dogmas and then accuse sceptics of being driven by religious zeal, and then constantly talk as if you are an idiot for being just a tad uncertain that your great-grandfather was a frog!

Living in the Secular Asylum we all need regular cheer up moments.  How about this one?  A Religious Order for women with Down syndrome!  Beautiful, absolutely beautiful!

Whilst the murderous gate keepers of the secular asylum hunt them down to cull them in their mothers' womb, a group of nuns in France have founded the Little Sisters Disciples of the Lamb, a contemplative order made up of women with Down syndrome.   This community was founded in 1985, canonically recognized as a public association by the Archbishop of Tours in 1990.

“Guided by the wisdom of St Benedict, we teach our little disabled sisters the manual labour necessary for their development.  We live poverty in putting ourselves at their disposal.  With them, we share the work of everyday life.  The office, adoration and the praying of the rosary are adapted to their rhythm and their capacities.  In a spirit of silence, our prayer feeds every day on the Eucharist and on the meditation of the Gospel.”

It is moments like this one realises just how lovely the world would be if it was totally and genuinely Catholic.  Instead of Europe spending billions hunting down and culling the imperfect and inconvenient, whilst worshiping faggotry, not to mention every other depravity known to man, we would have a world where everyone was cherished, even the least of Christ's little ones.  To read more on this heart warming story, click on the image.

 

 

This Will Give You Cold Chills! Can we be in any doubt that the Caliphate is firmly established and progressing unhindered by anyone and encouraged by the likes of the odious BBC ?  News is suppressed , presumably by the real controllers of the media; the main funders of the likes of News Corp. - Saudi Arabia & UAE.

Speech by Geert Wilders, an elected member of the Dutch Parliament at the Four Seasons in New York.

Dear friends, Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission.  All is not well in the old world.  There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic.  We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe.  This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West.  The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

First, I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe .  Then, I will say a few things about Islam.  To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks.  But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world.  It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen.  And if they are, they might regret it.  This goes for the police as well.  It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners.  The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighbourhoods by neighbourhoods, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe .  With larger congregations than there are in churches.  And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region.  Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden .  In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim.   Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.  In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims.  Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'.  Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin .  The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves.  Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel.  I could go on forever with stories like this.  Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live.   San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now.  Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Centre reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France . One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority.  We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots.   Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus.  I call the perpetrators 'settlers'.  Because that is what they are.  They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam.  Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries.  Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a paedophile, and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza If it is good for Islam, it is good.  If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins.  But in its essence Islam is a political ideology.  It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person.  Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life.  Islam means 'submission'.  Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia.  If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most retrograde force in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran.  The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor.  I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times.  I support Israel .  First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz; second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defence.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial advance.   Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines , Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan , Lebanon , and Aceh in Indonesia .   Israel is simply in the way.  The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel .  It is a war against the West.  It is jihad.   Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us.  If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest.  Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favour of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behaviour, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a 'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II.  And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing.  The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine.  An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem ....

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts.  My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives.  All throughout Europe , American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish.  My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians.  We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe 's children in the same state in which it was offered to us.  We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams.  Future generations would never forgive us.  We cannot squander our liberties.  We simply do not have the right to do so.

We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.

Two blood chilling but critically important videos, must views for anyone who cares about freedom, and about the sort of Europe that we shall bequeath our children

The first video is an academic study of what Muslims mean by Jihad.  It is entitled the "Three Stages of Jihad" and the author is David Wood.  The video has been taken down several times by YouTube, so if the following link doesn't work, try doing a Google search on the "Three Stages of Islam". 

Liberals try to reassure us by drawing a line between radical Muslims and the rest. However, it is estimated that around 25% of Muslims are radicalised. That equates to almost the entire population of the United States! So we should not be reassured by liberal propaganda; after all, most Germans were decent people but that did not stop the German Nazis slaughtering millions

Please note that the second video is made by Islamists for Islamists so it is a very clear expression, from the Islamic State, of their faithful following of the path of Jihad that David Wood laid out in his "Three Stages of Jihad".  Here we witness the full implementation of Stage Three: Offensive Jihad.  Note that the new Caliph has named himself after the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, and has explicitly said he is repeating the "necessary pattern" of the first Caliphate by "cleansing the apostates and heretics" then moving against the infidels......that's you and me and everyone we know and love.

After Mohammed died in 632AD, the first Caliph, Abu Bakr, spent two years subduing all the Arab tribes who left Islam the moment Mohammed died. This is known as the "ridda" or "Apostasy Wars" and plays a very important part in Islamic history although (surprise, surprise) they don't often mention it to infidels. The ridda was incredibly bloody, although no real records exist, numerous Islamic scholars have mentioned figures between 60,000 to over 100,000 killed, including entire tribes wiped out by crucifixion, beheading, burning alive, etc. Take note, these were fellow Arabs who decided they didn't want to be Muslims once the warlord, Mohammed was dead.

Once everyone was agreed, "Hey, it's better to be Muslims than to be horribly slaughtered!", Abu Bakr turned his attention to the rest of the world and the rest, as they say, is History. History that is now being repeated before our eyes.

Please watch it all, difficult though it is to sit through, it is incredibly important.  DO NOT LET CHILDREN SEE IT , especially the last ten minutes or so; it is far too graphic. Watch it as soon as you can. Vlad Tepes has posted this twice and YouTube have removed it twice, so I don't know how long it will be available.  If you find it has been taken down again, try doing a Google search on the phrase, "Caliphate releases video of unusual honesty and profound significance". 

Please take the time to read and understand what is written here, and please send it to every free person that you know, it is so very important.

Calling All Trads to Support the Traditional Ordinariate A date for all Traditionalist Catholics to put in their diary

Saint  Agatha's  Church
Portsmouth

Our Lady of Walsingham
Saturday  27th. September 11.00  am.
Solemn  High  Mass
Ordinariate Use - Traditional Rite
+
Mozart:  Mass in G. Spatzen Messe
Portsmouth Baroque Choir & Orchestra
+
Homily:   Fr. Matthew Goddard. FSSP
+
Buffet Refreshments afterwards.

Portsmouth & Southsea main railway station is just 10 minutes walk from the Church.
By road, follow 'Historic Ships' onto Market Way and then exit  second left onto Cascade Approach: Saint Agatha's is right before you with plenty of parking facilities.

On the Lighter Side

School Photo - Class of 2013

Can you pick out A'ishah Abdalla (Clue: she's at the back on the left)

Email Us

We’re on the Web