FOOF Conference - "The
        Catholic Church; Crisis and Revival"
      
Pro
        Ecclesia are organising a conference to address the current crisis in
        the Church, with a superb line-up of speakers who should excite any
        red blooded Catholic.  Buy a ticket
        to ensure your place and put the date  in your diary.
      Date: Saturday 11th May 2013
        Time: Doors open 9:30, Talks start 10:00am
        Venue: The Regent Hall, 275 Oxford Street, London, W1C 2DJ
      
        Just take a look at the program     
      
        - Our this crisis arose - Daphne McLoed
          
            - Testamony from a victim of modern catechetics
 
            - Two letters read out by Graham Moorhouse
              
                - One from a Catholic Diocesan Worker
 
                - One from a Catholic RE teacher sacked
                  for teaching the Faith
 
              
             
          
         
        - Why we home-school our children - Tom Windsor
 
        - "The Catholic Faith in a Hostile Culture" - Fr Hunwicke
 
        - "Feminist Dissent in the Church" Harriet Murphy B.A. D.Phil
 
        - MICHAEL VORIS - "The Future of the Church in Europe" Visit
        Michael's website: michaelvoris@realcatholictv.com  
 
        
        Tickets £10, available from Graham Moorhouse, 118 Shepherds
        Lane, DARTFORD, DA1 2NN,  Email: graham@cathud.com  Tel: 0132-240-9231.   Pay
          by cheque, postal order, cash or credit card (Cheques made payable
          to Pro Eccelsia et Pontifice)
        NB: Tickets may be available on the door, but they are selling fast,
          so buy in advance to avoid disapointment. 
        Come back
          Joseph Goebbels, all is forgiven ...
        The news blackout is a powerful
          weapon that is being increasingly used by the masters of the secular
          asylum to keep the masses compliant.  I
          recently, as a result of complete serendipity, found myself talking
          to a senior executive of the BBC.  On condition of unanimity,
          she was completely open about the fact that news blackouts were blatantly
          used to massage the news.  
        For example, a couple of weeks
          ago, over a million anti-gay  "marriage" protesters
          took over the centre of Paris. The authorities responded by tear-gassing
          women and children and old men. Ninety-nine percent of the populace
          would be excused for being completely unaware that it had taken place;
          our secular liberal masters had ordered a complete news blackout of
          what was probably the largest popular demonstration ever seen in the
          French capital. 
        Another news blackout is currently
          in place, the subject this time is one Kermit Gosnell.  Who is
          Kermit Gosnell you may well ask.  Kermit
           is an abortionist on trial in Philadelphia for murdering eight people;
          if found guilty, he will be officially a serial killer.  Note
          for comparison, the death toll of the Boston bombers was three, and
          just reflect on how much news coverage they generated.  Kermit's
          method of abortion was to cause the child to be born alive (often into
          the WC apparently) and then decapitate it.  One
          child was so big, Kermit allegedly quipped, before beheading the little
          boy, "he
          could walk me to the bus stop".  Kermit is on trial
          for the murder of seven babies, and for killing one woman following
          a botched abortion. 
        So why the news blackout? - simple,
          Kermit is an abortionist.  In
          the secular liberal asylum, the sins of abortionists must be covered
          up, just as the sins of the predatory sodomites among the clergy were
          covered up by our post-Conciliar "shepherds". 
       However, the news blackout is a blunt
         weapon and sometimes needs to be used more selectively. There is
         no blanket news blackout, for example, covering the recent tragic death
         of an Asian lady in Ireland following the Irish medical profession's
         refusal to abort her baby. This
          story is being milked by the media notwithstanding the fact that there
          is not a scrap of evidence to suggest that the refusal had any relevance
          to her tragic death. The implication is that Ireland would be
          a safer place for women if it legalised abortion. 
        However, a more selective news blackout
          is in place around this story to conceal the fact that the maternal
          mortality rate in the UK (where abortion is not only legal but industrialised)
          is twice that of the Republic.  Indeed, a pregnant woman, given
          the choice, would be well advised to have her baby in Ireland, given
          that she has double the chance of dying in childbirth in the UK.  Further,
          Ireland's infant mortality rate, according to the latest 2010 figures,
          is nearly 20% lower than the UK's, so, not only she but also her child
          would have a better chance of survival. 
        Secular liberals, in their diabolical
          crusade to advance their culture of death, are clearly more than happy
          to climb over the corpses of dead women to get to the promised land.
        Ministry
        of the Bleeding Obvious
        The MBO recently announced that
        those who jump out of airplanes without parachutes are at significant
        risk of injury.  This announcement had me reflecting: why is it
        that our forefather didn’t feel the need to spend millions on research
          projects to prove the bleeding obvious, while the leaders of the current
          secular asylum reject the bleeding obvious even when it is backed up
        by the findings of research projects costing million? 
         In a historic study of children
          raised by homosexual parents, the University of Texas has comprehensively
          squashed the patent absurdity  that such children suffer no disadvantages
          when compared to children raised by their married mother and father.  Just
          published in the journal of Social Science Research, the most careful,
          rigorous, and methodologically sound study ever conducted on this issue
          found numerous and significant differences - with the outcomes
          for children of homosexuals rated "suboptimal" in almost
          all of the forty categories measured. 
         Just two examples: the children
          of homosexual parents were ten times more likely to have been sexually
          abused by a parent or other adult caregiver, and were four times more
          likely to have been forced to have sex against their will - that’s “raped” in
        your and my books. 
         What a surprise!  Who would
          have thought that people suffering from a sexual pathology that has
          given us over forty percent of serial murderers, nearly ninety percent
          of convicted paedophiles, a significant percent of the leadership of
          the Nazi party, Count Giles de Rais, virtually the entire officer core
          of the Storm Troopers, Countess Elizabeth Bathory, some twenty percent
          of the Nazi death camp’s most sadistic guards and such sane pronouncement
          as “I’m
          a woman trapped in a man’s body” – Oh, and AIDs of
          course (30 million dead so far and still counting) - should turn out,
          all things being equal, not to be winning too many parent of the year
        awards? 
         The MBO will be telling us next
        that the clinically obese don’t win too many Olympic medals.
         To learn more, click HERE. 
        The Call to Beauty
          - An Interview with Perhaps One of the Best Popes We Didn't Get
        "It has a beauty to it
            that is beyond discussion, least to reasonable people." 
        An interview with Raymond Cardinal
          Burke:
        
         Dogmas
          from the Secular Asylum
         The leaders of the secular asylum
          have given us in just over a decade: the millennium bug, we’re
          all going to die from swine flue, we’re all going to die from
          bird flue, global warming and the wonders of sodomite parenting. 
         Oh, and, I nearly forgot, Darwin’s
          200th birthday.  Darwin was some chap whose followers believe
          that if one leaves a bucket of sterile mud on one’s patio for
          a decent enough time, one could return to find it had written the complete
          works of Shakespeare.  Although they prefer to call the sterile
          mud, “primeval
        soup” - the “soup” bit apparently makes all the difference. 
         The Amoeba Dubia’s genome
          has 670 billion units of DNA, or base pairs. The genome of a cousin,
          Amoeba Proteus, has a mere 290 billion base pairs, making it 100 times
          larger than the human genome!  Darwinists believe that one of
          these, what they like to call,  “primitive life forms” (that
          incidentally also has the ability to reproduce themselves - and the “will” to
          do so) may have been created by electricity striking their “primeval
          soup”.  As a creation theory it’s on a par with such
          theories as, “the world was created by the copulating of two
          giant raccoons.”
         I used to test batteries by sticking
          my tongue on the terminals: who knows, I may personally be responsible
        for kick-starting several new life forms! 
        Why socialism
        can never work … whether it emanates from state or Church.
        An economics professor at a local
          college made a statement that he had never failed a single student
        before, but had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted
        that Obama's socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one
        would be rich, a great equalizer.
         The professor then said,  "OK,
          we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan".  All
          grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so
          no one will fail and no one will receive an A.... (Substituting grades
          for dollars - something closer to home and more readily understood
          by all)
         After the first test, the grades
          were averaged and everyone got a B. The students who studied hard were
          upset and the students who studied little were happy.  As the
          second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied
          even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free
          ride too so they studied little.
         The second test average was a D!  No
          one was happy.  When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was
        an F.
         As the tests proceeded, the scores
          never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in
          hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.  
          To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told them that
          socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great,
          the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward
          away, no one will try or want to succeed.  Could not be any simpler
          than that. 
        
          - 
            
You cannot legislate the poor
            into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
           
          - 
            
What one person receives without
            working for, another person must work for without receiving. 
           
          - 
            
The government cannot give to
              anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody
            else. 
           
          - 
            
You cannot multiply wealth by
            dividing it! 
           
          - 
            
When half of the people get
            the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is
            going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea
            that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get
            what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
           
        
        Can you think of a reason for not
        sharing this?
        Quote of the month:
        "We can easily understand a
          child for being afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when
          adults are afraid of the light" - Plato
        “Here’s
        hoping the next Deli Lama isn't a Buddhist.” 
        One of those things that always
          amuse me during every interregnum, is the spectacle of liberal Catholics,
          that is the faction who keep their centre of consciousness firmly fixed
          six inches below their belt button, queuing up to tell us that what
          we really need is a liberal pope who will drive a coach and horses
          through the Church’s 2000 year’s old teaching on such matters
          as artificial contraception, abortion and sodomy.  If you browse
          the comments on any site commenting on the recent interregnum, you
          will find around a third of the annotations come from such folk, who,
          so drunk on their own importance, have failed to notice that they have
          staggered into the wrong church.
        Given that this has never happened
          in 2000 years, it’s a bit like hoping that the next Deli Lama
          won’t be a Buddhist.  One would have thought that most people
          would be bright enough to realize that one needs to be a Catholic to
          be elected pope.  It’s a sort of minimal requirement for
          job applicants, like having good vision helps if you want to be an
          airline pilot, or, you should be able to swim if you apply for a job
          as a life-saver on Brighton beach.
        Indeed, there are theologians who
          would argue that if a pope was to attempt to do any such thing, he
          would ipso facto cease to be the pope.  Indeed, sedevacantist
          Catholics believe that this has already happened.  They believe
          that the post-Conciliar popes have not been true popes and we are thus
          in a 40-year long interregnum.  Whist I believe sedevacantist
          are mistaken, I also acknowledge that they are in good faith and that
          there are some formidable intellects and scholars in their camp.
        Tens of thousands of our forefathers
          in faith were beheaded, devoured by wild beasts, burned alive, stoned
          to death, gored by wild bulls, thrown into quick-lime, slow-roasted
          over fires, stabbed to death, suffocated, sewn into sacks with poisonous
          reptiles, strangled, buried alive, racked, torn with hooks, shot with
          arrows, rolled in pitch and set on fire, frozen to death, hanged and
          pressed to death under weights, rather than offer one grain of incense
          to the gods and idols of false religions.  Yet JP2 publicly venerated
          the Koran and invoked the protection of St John the Baptist upon Islam,
        whilst B16 has exhorted us to respect false religions on numerous occasions.
        One is forced to assume that our
          post-Conciliar popes believe that most of the saints and martyrs we
          venerate at Mass where unhinged fanatics.    Surely, in these
          circumstances, one would have to be particularly dense, not to have
          just a little bit of empathy for where sedevacantists are coming from.
        Amateur cannon lawyers from the
          Neo-Catholic camp, always eager to dam anyone who questions the latest
          novelties; have no doubt already written them all off as schismatics.  I
          prefer to see them as brothers-in-arms, who, in the fight for tradition
          and in the fog of battle, have sadly taken a wrong turning; like a
          platoon, who in a daring foray, have just captured an empty enemy gun
          post; they may have wasted time and ammo, but there is no doubt whose
          side they’re on.
        On the Lighter Side - Life in South
          Africa as Seen by One of its Great Cartoonist, Zapiro:
        
       
        Catholic Conversation Stoppers
        
        Some time in 2011, Anne and I and
          one of our grandchildren were flying over a remote areas of Kenya in
          one of those tiny four-seater airplanes (Cessnas I believe they are
          called).
        The pilot was an elderly white Kenyan
          of Scottish extraction, with all that dourness and reticent that
          is supposed to characterise his race.  At one point in the flight,
          he broke his silence with, "Kenya is heading
          for a demographic disaster.  The
          average Kenyan woman has six [if my memory serves] children." 
        "Oh," I responded, "I
            can't say too much, because I had eight."  This was
            greeted with some unintelligible guttural noises from Mr McTavish
            before slumping back into his seemingly habitual broody silence.
        It moments like this when you realise
          that there is an unbridgeable gulf set between genuine Catholics and
          contemporary secular culture - we are in it for good or ill, but certainly
          not of it.  I wonder
          if any of our readers have their own examples of Catholic Conversation
          Stoppers.